community of royalty free images and stock photography
Language: EN DE ES FR IT NL PT
Login Password
Forgot your password? | Not a member?

 
Home > Blogs! > Sami Haqqani's Blog
Impressive... but is it Pandora's box?     posted on 10th of august, 2007

I came across this article on the BBC News website: Photo tool could fix bad images

And I have to say that I am very impressed that someone has managed to develop something this ingenious. But at the same time it raised a few questions for me.

Is something like this going to make photographers lazier? Remember the days before digital cameras? When there was no immediacy of seeing your shot and no instant correction if something was wrong with the picture? You had to take notes as to what settings you had used and then wait for the whole thing to be developed... and then figure out whether it was good enough and whether or not you had to go back and redo it? Well digital has been a boon to all of us... it's made things a lot easier... but it hasn't necessarily taken away the need for getting to know your camera and learn the fundamentals of photography yet. In fact we've probably had to acquire a whole new set of skills as well as the old ones (post-processing, etc).

The other question I asked myself was just how this would impact copyright issues. If someone uses a piece of my picture to enhance their own image, how am I ever going to find out? How are agencies like DT going to know? Are we all going to have to start producing some sort of certifications to prove that this is a 100% owned image? Is this even ethical?

Any thoughts?


Tags: copyright ethics photography skills technology

Yahoo! My Web Windows Live Google Bookmarks Facebook Technorati Digg Ask StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Squidoo BlinkList Dzone Fark Furl Ma.gnolia Mybloglog Newsvine Netscape Propeller Reddit Slashdot Sphinn 
Comments (3)

Comment by Shadow69 on August 10, 2007
Thanks Ellen. Good to find that I wasn't driving myself mental thinking about the implications without justification ;-)
Comment by Boughn on August 10, 2007
Apparently the people behind this technology focused on the technology and did not consider copyright issues. See http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Internet_photo_tool_faces_copyright_glitch_news_135727.html
Comment by Tamas on August 10, 2007
indeed, in a few years the photographer is no need to have anymore. I think this is great!

This article has been read 159 times.
 
    Search the blogs!
Latest Articles (RSS 2.0 )
  Appreciative thanks!
  When's whose birthday????
  Helping hand
  Quitting
  Job Hunting - Part 2
  Job hunting - Part 1
  It happened one day...
  A new addiction
  The Great Picture
  Security in the blog world

Create your own blog in seconds...
Archive
2007
  October (3)
  September (6)
  August (9)
  July (2)
    About Me
Sami Haqqani (Shadow69)
Geneva, CH

Exclusive user

 
Upload image | About Us | FAQ | Contact Us | Terms of use | API / Referral program | Site map | Privacy policy
Support - phone: 1.615.771.5611, Click here to contact us

dreamstime
  Copyright © 2000-2008 Dreamstime. All rights reserved.
Dreamstime is a member of PACA and CEPIC.
HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.