|
This is a call to the other newbies on Dreamstime. I respect, admire, and am floored by members with 200, 2,000 or 20,000 downloads, but I'm thinking right now of people, like me, who are just getting started. What has it been like for you? How did you get started trying to share (and sell) photos via Dreamstime? How do you go about determining which photos you will submit? Are you culling your collection of photos from days and years past, or are you creating work specifically for Dreamstime? What have you been learning, and wanting to learn, about this process? I've been wrestling with all of the above, and I would love to hear from you--established successes and newbies like me both! (Apparently I need to provide at least one image, so I'll include ... [ Read more... ]
|
Tags: beginning newbie newcomer novice
|
|
|
|
Comments (2)
|
 |
Amyemilia, thanks for your post, and for mentioning your photos. That shot of Joshua trees is really stunning. i wish _I_ could create that!
About the accept/reject issue: I know that it's tough to see to 'not selected' messages, and I have had more than my share, but something I read on one of these boards helped me a lot: The accept/reject decision isn't a judgement of quality, but rather a decision on whether the image meets the Dreamstimes marketing strategy. Reading that helped me take things a little less personally.
What do you think of the Noiseware Professional? I have been struggling with noise myself, especially in skies (where I guess it's more obvious).
Since we have to post an image, here's a golden pheasant I encountered the other day: [imgl]3935108[/imgl] - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 17, 2008 |
 |
Hi Charles! I am definitely a newbie at Dreamstime, and also at stock photography. Dreamstime is my first effort at selling my photos as stock. My first downloads were on January 4th I think, and were approved on January 11. 6 of 38 were accepted. A 15% approval rate isn't too great but hopefully I can learn from the experience. I submitted 5 more, and 2 were accepted. Now I have 23 pending.
Some of the refusals are baffling, but I really have not tried to contest them. A lot of them say that composition is an issue - yet I can clearly imagine them being used in publications. Obviously I don't have a designer's eye yet! :)
In terms of picking photos, it was a pretty easy process. I only bought my Nikon D40X in October. Before that, nearly all my digital photos are too small at least by the definitions I have read here. And until I get a better handle on acceptance I'm not going to spend a lot of money have the old film shots scanned!
I've been going through the ... More) - posted by
Amyemilia
on January 17, 2008 |
|
This article has been read 132 times.
|
|
|
I have noticed that many of my fellows Dreamstimes members maintain active Flickr sites. I've enjoyed looking through those, and have gotten lots of great inspiration from the photos. I'm wrestling with the idea of creating my own Flickr site. I see a couple pros, and a couple cons. On the positive side, I can see that sharing photos is (almost) always satisfying. Once the shots are on Flickr, it's no work at all to get them to clients, family, friends. . . I have a sense that Flickr offers a lot of community features, too, many ways to find photographers with similar interests. Finally, unless I'm wrong, it's free. On the other hand: I use Apple's Aperture and my .mac account to create and share web galleries. I'm pretty happy with the integration between Aperture ... [ Read more... ]
|
Tags: blog copyright flickr sales
|
|
|
|
Comments (10)
|
 |
The way I run my flickr account is this: I take a photo, downsize it, provide a watermark (sometimes two), and I add a link to Dreamstime. I refrain from publishing EVERY photo available on DT, just one from a series to be an example of what can be expected on DT. See my flick profile: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sebcz/ - posted by
Sebcz
on January 25, 2008 |
 |
Thanks Charles!
Just had my first two approved..Yay!
C - posted by
Cleaper
on January 24, 2008 |
 |
Thanks Charles!
Just had my first two approved..Yay!
C - posted by
Cleaper
on January 24, 2008 |
Comments (10) |
This article has been read 471 times.
|
|
|
I don't know about anyone else, but isolating images is one of my least favorite tasks in Photoshop. I see that there was a blog on this topic in late December, but that was focused on shooting within a lightbox, or in other conditions that you can manipulate. Lots of times, I'm trying to isolate a large object that I found in natural conditions, rather than a small subject that I can get in a lightbox. I have tried just about every method I can find to isolate my subject, and then create credible, realistic transitions between the image and the background. Magic Wand, Quick Select, Extraction, Calculations. . . None of these are easy, and few are satisfying. I end up spending hours on a single image, trying to get things just right. What do other people do? I have seen many beautiful ... [ Read more... ]
|
Tags: background isolating isolation selection white
|
|
|
|
Comments (17)
|
 |
I see that your technique has been working. I think I need to amp up my light so that I have overexposed backgrounds from the beginning. Trying to remove them via PS is not nearly as easy (for me) as getting the exposure the way I want it in the first place.
[imgr]4234081[/imgr] - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on February 14, 2008 |
 |
I've experimented with isolated object in a selfmade lightbox. Made from white cardboard, with enough light shining into the box.
http://www.dreamstime.com/toy-tank-isolated-image4266898
if the results of the white background are not satisfying, you can try to use the option "replace color" in photoshop to get a nice white background. - posted by
Rvanburen
on February 14, 2008 |
 |
Sorry, that it was so easy ;-)
But for such a complexe composition you thought you need in my opinion to much time in relation to the microstock earnings. - posted by
Pumpa1
on January 31, 2008 |
Comments (17) |
This article has been read 536 times.
|
|
|
As I am deciding to open a Flickr account and start using it as a way to share photos, get critiques, and maybe even drive sales to Dreamstime, I wanted to toss out one more question: Does anyone have comments on Picasa? Several people have commented eloquently on their happiness with Flickr, and I have seen how active that community seems to be. On the other hand, much of my life is already integrated into my Google account, and so I don't want to toss away this option without at least giving it some consideration. So, any arguments for Picasa over Flickr if my goals are sharing, getting/giving critique and pointing people toward my Dreamstime portfolio?
|
Tags: flickr google picasa sales sharing
|
|
|
|
Comments (2)
|
 |
Thanks for the comments, everyone. I'm still muddling through this. . . - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 24, 2008 |
 |
Well, im a current user of Flikr and Picasa.
Flickr has a more extense community, but Picasa is growing very fast. The integration between Google users and Picasa is excelent, and also, it has a easiest way to upload pictures to a webalbum stored in your Google account.
You can try it both and then decide wich one to use as a common tool.
Hope this comment helps you. - posted by
Prepresspd
on January 24, 2008 |
|
This article has been read 128 times.
|
|
|
At this point in my exploration of Dreamstime, I've hit a wall: I've combed through my existing photos for shots that might have commercial value, and submitted most of those. I have no travel on the immediate horizon, and so, for now, my subjects are limited to my immediate area. For better or worse, I live in Washington, DC. The better: There are many, many iconic buildings here, from the Capitol to the White House to all the Smithsonians. The worse: These might just be the most photographed buildings in the country, with everyone from tourists with disposable cameras to the most accomplished pros capturing images of all the settings, in all seasons. So, how do you get started? How do you make that break between re-purposing existing photos to creating ... [ Read more... ]
|
Tags: creativity familiarity inspiration repurposing washington
|
|
|
|
Comments (5)
|
 |
I understand. I did a quick search for crowd and found many that exemplify this idea (such as this one)[imgr]3296243[/imgr]. Thanks for the idea. - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 24, 2008 |
 |
If you shoot from far enough, in order to show that there is a reeeealy big crowd I don't think that anybody would be identifiable, or try to shoot from behind when the crowd is watching a speech, or when marching. - posted by
Dcb
on January 24, 2008 |
 |
All good ideas, DcB, and I will definitely add the Korean Memorial to my list.
What about those crowd shots, though? How do you avoid the identifiability issue? - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 24, 2008 |
Comments (5) |
This article has been read 116 times.
|
|
|
Where to spend limited photo equipment dollars? Here's the dilemma: I will be heading to Africa on a safari with family this summer. Fourteen days of once-in-a-lifetime photo opportunities. Right now, my biggest lens is the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L with IS. I love this lens, BUT I have a feeling it pales in comparison with the Canon 300 f2/8 L with IS. On the other hand, the 300 is about $3900 at B&H. So, the question is: Is that 300 mm worth it? Or is it so big, heavy and attention-getting that I would hesitate to haul it out? Am I having an unjustified case of lens lust? Anyone out there have recommendations, one way or the other, on the Canon 300? I have heard it's technically outstanding, BUT do you use it much if you have it?
|
Tags: africa canon lens safari south
|
|
|
|
Comments (7)
|
 |
I have been toying around with the idea of a teleconverter. I have heard great things about them. I do miss the ability to reframe with the 300 mm, and sometimes find the field of view too limited (it's so darned close!), but I think that, for an upcoming safari, a teleconverter would be invaluable. - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on February 11, 2008 |
 |
I have the EF 300 f4L with IS that I also use with an EF 1x4 teleconverter which boosts the range dramatically with the loss of just one f stop. (With an EF x2 telconverter you would have no autofocus and would lose 2 f stops) ) Really great lens for shooting animals and although you have the 70-200, the range on this lens may not be good enough for shooting animals at a distance. You could whack an EF teleconverter on it though to boost the range some more.
How about getting an EF 100-400 LENS with IS and then whack on a 1x 4 teleconverter, that would give you massive range. I got one last year and I love it. Its weighty though, sometimes makes my arms ache when Im shooting with it for hours on end. - posted by
Marilyna
on February 10, 2008 |
 |
I grew up in DR Congo (used to be Zaire) although I also lived in Ruanda-Urundi (now Rwanda and Burundi). My folks were missionaries. I left Africa when I was 17 and haven't been back to Congo. But I have cousins in South Africa and Namibia and have visited them. I highly recommend Namibia (especially Sossusvlei and Etosha) for stark scenery and amazing animals. What a place! - posted by
Amyemilia
on January 30, 2008 |
Comments (7) |
This article has been read 127 times.
|
|
|
Tripods! Is carbon fiber really worth the extra $? Currently, I use a Bogen-Manfrotto tripod (I think it's model 3021B). It's fine--tall, and relatively sturdy--but it's HEAVY. Hauling it around when I already have a camera body or two in hand is a hassle. I'm not super happy with the ball head, either (also Bogen-Manfrotto). It works, but it's not all that easy to adjust, especially with a heavy camera/lens combo. I've been checking out the Gitzo Mountaineer tripods, and even tinkered with them at B&H one day. They are amazingly light, and supposedly extremely sturdy. On the other hand, they're a good chunk of change: over $1,000 for tripod and ballhead. So, my second equipment question is: Is a really good tripod worth it? Has anyone here moved from a good, but not great,... [ Read more... ]
|
Tags: ballhead gitzo manfrotto tripod weight
|
|
|
|
Comments (2)
|
 |
Thanks for the comments. For what it's worth, I ordered the Gitzo 2530 just before I read your post. To help offset the pain a little, a semi-miraculous event occurred: I happened to be shooting down on the Mall in DC, and struck up a conversation with a guy who was in the market for a good tripod. A trip to Starbucks later, he had my Bogen, I had a check, and we were all happy. - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 30, 2008 |
 |
IMHO, carbon fiber provides a small weight savings with a much bigger price that just isn't worth it.
I have six tripods: three Gitzos and three Bogens. Despite the price difference they're about equal in durability. My largest Gitzo extends to 12', and doesn't leave the studio anymore. All "sets of sticks" are crowned with Bogen ball-heads: all with the RC2 quick release system. My two biggest pods have the Bogen ProBall 468's with adjustable drag and I LOVE them, even with an EOS 1Ds MkII and a 70-200. They lock down without any troublesome "shift".
Are they all worth it? To me, my mortgage, and my kids braces... YES.
Impact on image quality? Compared to hand-held... YES. Compared to a lesser tripod... NOT REALLY.
Then why are they worth it? Because they do their job predictably and reliably, and have done it for many years, with many more years to come. They can be adjusted for hillsides, staircases, table edges, and sandy beaches. They've survived being ... More) - posted by
Photoboykane
on January 29, 2008 |
|
This article has been read 113 times.
|
|
|
So, I've got a refrigerator full of interesting food, a pantry with tons of stuff, a decent tripod (if not the the tripod of my dreams), and a Photoflex lightbox. Where to go from here? I know that food photos sell well, but I've had some trouble in the inspiration department. Has anyone else been in this position? If so, where did you start? Any ideas on which common foods, things I have around the house already, are suitable? I did try a series of spices, on and off a wooden cutting board, but they didn't make the cut. . .
|
Tags: food kitchen lightbox pantry
|
|
|
|
Comments (5)
|
 |
Hmm. . . That's an interesting idea. My first thought is some experimentation with stopping the action via flash at the moment of impact. - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 30, 2008 |
 |
Fruits and vegetables are so sculptural... I'd focus on those aspects. Also really liked a shot I saw on Flickr... can't find the link at the moment - of an orange being dropped into water. Maybe adding movement? I am visualizing suspending a fig or green bean or walnut half from some kind of invisible string and then making it swing across the frame. - posted by
Amyemilia
on January 29, 2008 |
 |
Hah-hah! I love the idea of mystery and ambience. I will definitely check out Michael Ray's work. As for the comment about just eating it--me, too! - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 27, 2008 |
Comments (5) |
This article has been read 184 times.
|
|
|
I will have the good fortune to spend a week at what is said to be a very nice resort in Mexico next month. The resort is set on what they call the Maya Riviera. I have seen many beautiful images of Mayan ruins (see this shot from Kineticimagery), and even more gorgeous photos of Mexican beaches. As always, though, I would like to find a new take on the subjects at hand. What is still to be shot in this part of the world? Has anyone been down there and thought afterward 'Oh, if only I had thought about THAT?' Or have any designers searched through the Maya Riviera photos and wished there were more photos of something else?
|
Tags: beach maya riviera ruins
|
|
|
|
Comments (5)
|
 |
This is very helpful info. So, no fee without a tripod, $300 with a tripod? Very good to know. - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on February 05, 2008 |
 |
If you go to Chichen Itza and want to take "professional" photos you will need to purchase a license. And by professional they mean you are using a tripod. I think it was ~$300.
Also, I found the bus trips to be very slow and time wasteful if i went again I would just hire a cab for the day (you might be able to split it with another guest) and move around on your own time. - posted by
Kropewnicki
on February 05, 2008 |
 |
I haven't been there in such a long time... I visited Cozumel in December 2005. You should I think try to document the return of life after Hurricane Wilma in 2005. It really devastated Cozumel, and I'd be interested to see what the island did to cope.
The Spanish release idea is a great one! - posted by
Amyemilia
on January 29, 2008 |
Comments (5) |
This article has been read 157 times.
|
|
|
A few days ago, I was lamenting in this very blog about the mixed blessing of living in Washington, DC: Nearly all the buildings, at least downtown, are extremely photogenic. At the same time, you can't walk down the Mall without seeing at least 1 photographer per square foot. Since writing that entry, I have spent a lot of time in the city's museums and around the major monuments. Looking at them through a potential designer's eyes, trying to sort out what would and what would not be useful, has been eye-opening. I've tried to focus (literally!) on the universal appeal of what I'm seeing, while at the same time appreciating what's unique about a particular angle, or one afternoon's unique sky, or a detail that might be overlooked without ... [ Read more... ]
|
Tags: familiarity fresh overlooked vision washington
|
|
|
|
Comments (2)
|
 |
Thanks, AmyEmilia. The amount of 'photoshoping' for each shot I posted was radically different. The interior of the Library of Congress had minimal sharpening; the lunar lander had some levels adjustments to whiten the background, and the flag and Archives underwent a big transformation. I isolated then enlarged the building itself, moved the building up and to the left, straightened the flag pole, and removed some nasty dust. - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 30, 2008 |
 |
I really like the shots you posted. Good stuff! - posted by
Amyemilia
on January 29, 2008 |
|
This article has been read 131 times.
|
|
|
Dust!
posted on 30th of january, 2008
|
|
|
This entry is for all the photographers out there who have had to deal with my biggest photo phobia: DUST. Sometimes, dust doesn't raise its ugly head. When I've got an intricate subject and vivid colors, it can find lots of places to hide. On the other hand, half my photos have a big chunk of blue sky. Each and every time I scrutinize one of these shots, I find those annoying blurs and blobs. So, my question is: What do you do about dust? I've read a million how-tos on the web, advocating everything from blowers to swabs to vacuums. I am pretty darned nervous about sticking anything in the bowels of my cameras, but enough is enough. The most promising solution seems to be something called the 'Arctic ... [ Read more... ]
|
Tags: annoyance blower cleaning dust swab
|
|
|
|
Comments (3)
|
 |
I have an Olympus with the Anti Dust shaking system which is great for the sensor etc but you can still guarantee that I will have an annoying dust particle on the outside of my lens that I don't notice until uploading the images!! May have a look into light pens. - posted by
Cleaper
on January 31, 2008 |
 |
Thanks for the tip. That looks like a good solution, and it's not too expensive. The spinning Arctic Butterfly brush is about 4 times that. I have two bodies now, and so I am needing to change lenses less than before, which feels great--now I just need to get rid of the dust that's already accumulated. - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on January 30, 2008 |
 |
Lens pens are great, as long as you get a good quality one. I have one designed for rifle optics that is fabulous at removing smudges! As far as the sensor goes, I use Sensor Swab. If you are really nervous about using anything on your sensor, you should be able to send your camera off to the manufacturer for a sensor cleaning. But call in advance to ask how much it costs (plus don't forget shipping!). - posted by
Kenneystudios
on January 30, 2008 |
|
This article has been read 134 times.
|
|
|
Next week, I will have the chance to spend a couple days in and around Denver. I don't know the city at all, but I hope to change that, and of course I'll have my camera around my neck. I've checked out the available shots of Denver, and have found some beautiful images (see above and below, and there are plenty more. As always, though, I want to go beyond what's already been done. Any Denverites here with ideas on photo opportunities? I'll have plenty of time and a car, so locations outside the city are fine, too. Alternatively, any designers (do they read these blogs?) with Denver photo hopes/needs?
|
Tags: alternative denver new opportunity vision
|
|
|
|
Comments (3)
|
 |
Thanks for the tips. I just checked the weather, and we should have a good mix of some clouds and some sun. I'm looking forward to this! - posted by
Charlesoutcalt
on February 01, 2008 |
 |
I think some photos of the creek that runs down through downtown Denver would be interesting. I forgot the name of that creek. Platte? Something taken from the east with the skyline with mountains in the background would be nice. - posted by
Dreamtimepress
on January 30, 2008 |
 |
I live about 3 hours from denver, but have been there many times. There are zoos, parks, mountains, ski resorts. Pretty much anything you could imagine there, that would make great subjects for pictures. I hope you have a great time! - posted by
Torie508
on January 30, 2008 |
|
This article has been read 118 times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Search the blogs! |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Archive |
|
2008
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Outcalt
(Charlesoutcalt)
Potomac, US
Discovering the world, one little bit at a time. . . If you choose to download one of my images, please consider dropping me a note via the comments section to let me know how you will use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|