community of royalty free images and stock photography
Language: EN DE ES FR IT NL PT
Login Password
Forgot your password? | Not a member?

 
Home > Blogs! > Charles Outcalt's Blog
Panoramas, and Why the Polarizer Is Not Your Friend     posted on 17th of march, 2008

What could be more natural than using a circular polarizer on a sunny day with a few clouds? What better way to bring some definition to those clouds, intensify the colors without introducing weird PhotoShop-y elements, and darken up that sky? And, if you're intending to take multiple shots to create a panorama later, wouldn't that polarizer be even more useful?

Here's what I learned when I examined those would-be panorama shots back on the big screen (as opposed to my 3 inch viewfinder): that polarizer is NOT your friend if you want to stitch shots together. Sure, the sky looks more intense, but that intensity jumps around from shot to shot, as the angle of the sun hitting the polarizer changes. Some shots will have oddly intense areas, others will be a little paler. . .

Luckily, I did manage to avoid this problem--by dumb luck--with a few of my intended desert panoramas. Next time I will know there's a better way to keep the dust off my lens.

 


Tags: filter panorama polarizer sky sun

Yahoo! My Web Windows Live Google Bookmarks Facebook Technorati Digg Ask StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Squidoo BlinkList Dzone Fark Furl Ma.gnolia Mybloglog Newsvine Netscape Propeller Reddit Slashdot Sphinn 
Comments (3)

Comment by Lightart on March 18, 2008
I have found that, as far as stitched images are concerned, that any continuous tone blue sky image is difficult to work with, polarizer or not. While it is not always evident, the position of the sun in a stark blue sky will create light and dark areas in your image that will be difficult to match up as you move horizontally across the horizon as you reposition your camera. A polarizer of course magnifies the problem because it has a tendency to darken the sky differently depending upon the angle of the sun in relation to the lens and filter rotation. I usually stay away from pure blue sky and wait for a cloudy, or scattered cloudy day so that the tonal differences are less noticeable. Of course then you have to deal with matching cloud edges, which isn't a problem if the wind wasn't blowing them all over the sky too fast. :)
Comment by Charlesoutcalt on March 18, 2008
I'm glad this helped. I guess I learned the hard way ;)

I checked out your portfolio. The shots of Sofia make me want to visit even more. I have friends living there who are always trying to convince me to fly over. Looks like a beautiful city.
[imgr]4435150[/imgr]
Comment by Omegatransfer on March 18, 2008
Thanks for the tip! I'm planing to buy a CPL filter so as far as I am a panorama-holic (I got some panoramas in my portfolio), I will follow you in not using it!

This article has been read 167 times.
Photo credits: Charles Outcalt, Charles Outcalt.
 
    Search the blogs!
Latest Articles (RSS 2.0 )
  From the designer's perspective
  Races Are Hard Work (Even When You Are Volunteering)!
  Runners!
  Models and Logos
  Feeling Good About a Milestone
  Panoramas, and Why the Polarizer Is Not Your Friend
  Feeling Self-Conscious
  Adventures with HDR
  Keeping Them All Straight
  Contrasts

Create your own blog in seconds...
Archive
2008
  April (1)
  March (11)
  February (4)
  January (12)
    About Me
Charles Outcalt (Charlesoutcalt)
Potomac, US

Discovering the world, one little bit at a time. . .

 

If you choose to download one of my images, please consider dropping me a note via the comments section to let me know how you will use it.

Exclusive user

 
Upload image | About Us | FAQ | Contact Us | Terms of use | API / Referral program | Site map | Privacy policy
Support - phone: 1.615.771.5611, Click here to contact us

dreamstime
  Copyright © 2000-2008 Dreamstime. All rights reserved.
Dreamstime is a member of PACA and CEPIC.
HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.