Microstock - the mp3 of photography?


posted on 3rd of may, 2008

A few years ago, music was available to masses through record producers only - vinyl or CD, the support didn't really matter. The producer started to act as a director, setting trends, creating stars, shaping new generation' addictions based on his own vision, creativity and knowledge. As money was involved, the artistic vision may be surpassed by financial reasons, giving birth to monster kitsch productions. You might think that what you hear at the radio is what the DJ likes. Is not really so (link)... The producer or label dictated the playlist more than ever.

Then a revolution begun, nurtured by the technological evolution. The MP3 file was born. The audio digital format was there before, but now, the MP3 allowed users to send each other files thanks to its very low file size. It has its drawbacks. The bitrate that controls the size can also control what your ear hears. You lose quality... But this is not the point of this post.

The point is that in a similar way the digital cameras affected the market of stock photography. They allowed a huge army of amateurs to pursue their passion. Nikon and Canon are the first to be blamed/acclaimed for this.

Blamed by the industry in the beginning, just as the MP3 format was, the digital cameras are now part of everyone's gear. And so will microstock be. Think how popular the MP3 has gotten. We may have tapes, vinyls, audio CDs...but the new generations are armed with Mp3 players and they purchase music by song and not by albums.
That's IF they "purchase": distribution got democratized and demand&offer are now in control, not a single person or a group of persons.

The days of the collection CDs will be over. Nobody will buy 300 images of the same theme, no matter how low the price. They want control and the right tune/ photograph. Sellers are no longer controlling this, but the buyer. The customer is in control, the agency does the marketing, gives the right tools and lets him decide.

Anyone can make the perfect photo for the perfect buyer. Veterans and newcomers compete on equal grounds. It's their imagery that makes the difference as well as the buyer.

Where did the last DJ go? To MySpace, to Itunes, to Dreamstime...

Comments (5)

Posted by Onlyfabrizio on January 07, 2009
Lee, your main income is not photography, right? See the other point of view.
Posted by Sophiesourit on May 06, 2008
so time is changing youpla boom.....
hip hip hip... for the buyers...
Posted by Thefinalmiracle on May 05, 2008
Hey Serban lets partner on a new Microstock Music company... I already have my own music label working on this idea :P I have the music knowledge and you know the market .. :D
Posted by Studioceja on May 04, 2008
Well put! However, I have one fear...... that the market will make it easy for lower quality images to flood the industry. It is true that the customer will search out the best quality (content and resolution) but for those new customers entering the market, I only hope for the best.
Posted by Seesea on May 03, 2008
Great article!
And I love this cute doggy!



Comments (5)

This article has been read 3101 times. 1 readers have found this article useful.
Photo credits: Barbara Helgason.
 
About Me
(Achilles)
Bucharest, RO
Archive
2013
October (1)
February (1)
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
Exclusive user Blogs
    Search the blogs!
Latest articles (RSS 2.0 )
  Your friends' mobiles carry your next referral sale!
  Google Images new layout - how this impacts photographers and webmasters
  +11,000 views for an image in a single day
  Dreamstime at CEPIC
  Why our Referral Program is the best?
  Similar images - how to upload and how much is too much
  Connect your Dreamstime and Facebook accounts!
  Join Dreamstime on Facebook and Twitter
  First official US president portrait
  Microstock - the mp3 of photography?

Create your own blog in seconds...
My favourite articles
None
More favorite articles

Photography related stock images