The exclusivity question

posted on 14th of august, 2009

In my blog I have published a post with some my thoughts about the exclusivity question (per images and full photographer exclusivity) that has became even more actual after the recent announce Serban made here at Dreamstime..

First point to be made clear: to go exclusive as a photographer is not an option for me now. I speak mostly about exclusivity per images.

In theory, the strategy to have exclusive images could be eventually a benefit, as you don't compete with yourself, but is hard to came up with lots of (good) different images for different agencies.
You could have on Dreamstime images of people in business for example and in another agency images of wild animals or travel. This could allow you to have more revenues for every single image, if... The problem in fact is that mostly agencies reward well the exclusive photographer, not the single images.

I know this is a subject that could spring a good debate and is ultimately a personal choice, but from a business point of view, seems to me that is not convenient to have exclusive photos nowhere, at this point (dreamstime assignment aside! :-)

Comments (1)

Posted by Linqong on August 16, 2009
Yes! it's a personal choice.
The most suitable one's own choice is a wise choice.

This article has been read 1105 times. 1 readers have found this article useful.
Photo credits: Eti Swinford, Robodread, Saniphoto.
About Me

confidential info
October (1)
    Search the blogs!
Latest articles (RSS 2.0 )
  More exclusive images
   Statistics in my blog
  The exclusivity question
  Photo for free?
  Text into images is not always that good
  Blogging may be a necessary marketing strategy
  Creative images must be planned
  Creative and funny
  The thumbnail effect on successful sales
  Two new posts in my blog

Create your own blog in seconds...
My favourite articles
More favorite articles

Related image searches

stock exclusive photography microstock

Exclusive related stock images