Transition from film to the digital world


posted on 17th of february, 2010

© Thefreemangroup (Help)
I am an amateur photographer.
Until relatively recently I shot film and was very pleased.
For years I used a basic SLR (Nikon F50) and various Nikon lenses.







Most of my pictures are from being in the right place at the right time and not so much setting the lighting for my purposes. It doesn’t mean I’m completely lucky or that this is an easy task.
Being in the right place in the right time includes going around the world and doing some inconvenient things I’m sure most of you have found yourself doing.
Things like sticking the camera to your face for 20 minutes without moving until the setting is just right, or finding yourself in an endless tedious mountain climb (just a bit more...) for a better view, or laying down in the mud for that...

[ Read more... ]
Comments (1)

Posted by smartview27 on February 18, 2010
digital world is not easy: informations, speed, incomes...



This article has been read 653 times.

My scanning experience and some advice


posted on 17th of february, 2010


So as you remember from my previous blog, I decided I want to scan all my negatives.
Lucky for me I am just an amateur so I found myself with only ~3000 pictures I gathered through the years that I wanted to scan (don’t worry, I won’t try to upload them all).
If I were a bit more serious I would really be in trouble.





And now the dilemma starts.
How much money are you willing to spend on pictures that were already taken?
It makes sense to invest in a new shiny DSLR because of the potential future photos you can take.
But what do you do about a scanner?






I shopped around some Photo labs back then (2008) and the price for scanning each frame was outrageous, I don’t think they offered even 3MP.
So I decided to buy a scanner....

[ Read more... ]
Comments (16)

Posted by Walkingthedog on August 17, 2013
I used the Nikon LS4000 for years with a very good result and used pictures scan from transparencies in magazine with excellent quality. I also use an epson perfection scanner, it is good enough if you start from a 2 1/4 slide with perfect exposure but it is very hard to get enough quality from a 35mm slide.
Posted by Thanatonautii on August 31, 2012
Many thanks for this article! It would be very useful to me!
Posted by Alaskalarry1 on August 30, 2012
On the above note: I said I have to consider if the pictures I took are of 'stock interest' or not, and if they are worth trying to scan and submit. Much of my travel is in Nepal, and my images are similar to yours, and I notice you have almost no downloads from those Nepal images. Bummer...
Nameste...



Comments (16)

This article has been read 2108 times. 2 readers have found this article useful.

About me


confidential info

Blogs Exclusive user
Archive
2011
June (1)
2010

Stock Photography that BLOGS!

Interact, make friends, share tips and techniques, have fun. Dreamstime wants your ideas and thoughts whether you are a photographer, designer or regular user. Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite images and photographers, post tutorials or simply exchange opinions with your with fellow dreamstimers.

Don't forget words and pictures go great together so make sure you choose some Dreamstime favorite pics to brighten your article. For inspiration, check out the hottest or the most useful blogs on the left.

Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite stock images and photographers

Create your blog

My favorite articles

    None

More favorite articles

Related image searches

scan sacanner film negative digital

Scan related stock images