All-in-One


posted on 15th of may, 2011

© Arrow (Help)
I have a mobile telephone. It's one of them smartphones, actually. It's got a 5Mpix camera, a 3.2" touch screen, only weighs 135 grams (4.76 ounces, for those using the wrong measuring scale :P) , is white (most of the time), has a full featured web-browser, Wi-Fi connectivity, has GPS navigation - the whole shebang. And that's the problem. Yes, I like my phone and use it extensively... but the experience is never satisfying. The camera often fails to impress me, even in optimal conditions. The screen kills my eyes when I try to usefully browse the net for anything more than 30 minutes because it's too small. The GPS simply sucks each and every drop of juice from the battery and the Wi-Fi often has poor coverage. It's an all-in-one and none-really-good. Worst of all - it can't match my old mobile phone from seven years ago when it comes to durability and battery life.
The phone will not substitute my camera, even when it comes to snapshots. I'm not throwing away my dedicated navigation system anytime soon (although it's a bit dated) and I still do most of my browsing quickly, efficiently and on my computer's large screen.

See, I think many of us photographers have fallen in the same trap. We try to jiggle with a dozen of things which other people call professions and still want to be good photographers, while having absolutely no expertise in performing complex circus tricks. We want to be an all-in-one but if by any means possible - never experience the compromises an all-in-one brings along. It's a noble cause but it often doesn't work.

I've been reflecting a lot on the growth of some photographers and the stagnation of others lately. When I decide to spend some time reading photography blogs the same thing keeps coming up - How do the big(ger) guys do it? Followed by I keep trying and keep failing.

Then I went ahead and thought more about how the big guys actually do it... Lo and behold - they don't. It's the big guys and their teams who manage to make glorious shoots happen. Teams which often include a stylist, a bag of beefed-up I-carry-anything assistants, a post-processing specialist (the Photoshop dude), an accountant, perhaps even a secretary.

As sad as it is - one can only do so much. Even an all-in-one one. A lucky bunch of a few out there have succeeded to do more than us mortal humans can but that's most likely irrelevant to you and me. Back here in the real world, if we're to try and accomplish all these different tasks well enough to build up a decent photo shoot, then process the results and account to uncle Sam for the earnings it will probably mean we shouldn't sleep for months. And it still won't be as good as when specifically gifted people do their own little piece of the job.

In practice this all means that we need to re-group. Individually. Then go out and find some people to help us if we really want to grow past a certain point. It means that hiring a stylist for at least some of your bigger shoots isn't a waste of money. It also means that if you can get a trustworthy Photoshop guy you'll free up more time for shooting, resting, developing your creativity however it is that you do that. Is keywording an issue for you? Train your retired English-speaking family members into the art of keywording (or, actually - use Dreamstime's keywording service) and rid yourself of it.

All-in-ones are popular nowadays. Fast food restaurants were popular too... once. :)
Optimize the amount of work you can do - down to only the work you can do really well. Find others to do the rest. It doesn't mean immediately hiring a team of 5 people to process your "rose from the back garden" image. As your workload grows slowly, grow your crew slowly. It doesn't have to start on professional level either. The main objective is that you save time and maintain good results.

So, what do you think?

---
Sent from my HTC Hero... nah, just kiddin'!

Comments (31)

Posted by Miele on June 12, 2011
Thanks for sharing!
Posted by Dotgeek on June 09, 2011
Great information!
Posted by Wysiwygfoto on June 07, 2011
I've been thinking about this article for some time and two comments come to mind. The first, is a quote from Theodore Roosevelt ~ "Do what you can, with what you have, where you are". Something to think about....

The second thought I have is we all have to ask why we do this. Some do it as a hobby, others do it as fulltime photographers, and then there are those in between. What it boils down to is we are selling "stock". That is, a stock of images that are sitting on a hard drive. How we obtain those images - whether from a walk in the countryside, or leftovers from a commissioned shoot - determines our success or failure from a financial perspective.

Why not spend your client's money? If you're photographing for an advertisement, get a model/property release. Any unused images can be uploaded as stock. If you're photographing products for a catalog, then save those images and re-market them rather than disposing of them. A few photographers here have given classes - and...(More)
Posted by Noeyedear on June 01, 2011
Well, I think my phone is fantastic. I travelled 200 miles via it's sat nav the other day receiving traffic updates while it also played the music for the trip. I no longer have to be stuck in the office as it provides me with my emails. I get satellite weather images which helps me with my aerial photography, it finds me Hotels and other stuff in the area. I browse the web no problem and keep up to date with ebay auctions, I can watch TV on it as well. It does so much, more than I ever thought possible.
My daughter filmed a video on it which was part of a degree coarse work project and it was marked as a "First". My iPhone is just stunning.
Now if I can perform half as well i'm onto a winner.
Anyone shooting models in a studio needs to be on top of their game though, just think who you are competing against. Why would anyone buy a picture of your friend, who does her own makeup etc and you're not so expert retouching when the business is awash with quality models professionally made...(More)
Posted by Waxart on May 30, 2011
I agree that hiring stylists, models, etc. makes the cost of being a microstock photographer prohibitive for most of us. However, I use family members as models and my husband as my assistant. Lately I have been experimenting with more unusual content in order to distinguish my portfolio from that of the 'big boys & girls'. None of these submitted yet, so I can't tell if my approach will be successful, but I'm having a lot of fun dreaming up ideas.
Posted by Voytekj on May 30, 2011
Thanks for sharing....
Posted by Jianbinglee on May 28, 2011
Very interesting article!
Posted by Almaterra on May 25, 2011
Interesting!
Posted by Anhong on May 24, 2011
Interesting article, thanks for sharing!
Posted by Vhcreative on May 22, 2011
The world is changing! So is the way to earn money. Few years before for some there were no way to sell their work online. Now it is so cheap! And we can not STOP IT. All we can - is to adopt our ways to earn those damn money.
Posted by Lculig on May 19, 2011
Great post, I agree with you on almost all points. It's a sad thing in this modern world, that one can only do so much. :/
Posted by Onime on May 18, 2011
Interesting blog!
Posted by Bradcalkins on May 18, 2011
I think the part-timers who succeed at stock are in fact those who are "All in ones" :)
Posted by Mlhead on May 18, 2011
I agree that all those expenses are more than I can take on having earned so little from stock. But I am going to take some classes this summer and I hope that will help me get to the next step.
Posted by Fleyeing on May 17, 2011
All so true and I didn't want to be the first to mention it, but there is a large elephant in the room ;-)
How are we supposed to pay for models, stylists, studio and photoshoppers from (mostly) 0.35 dollarcents per sale? Microstock has simply become unsustainable for this kind of financial effort.
Posted by Digitalexpressionimages on May 17, 2011
Yes, this seems like something one would do if one had sufficient working capital to survive until the revenue from your increased productivity started to roll in. Expenses like paying staff and models costs you right now while revenue trickles in over time. I paid models in the past and have yet to make the money back. Considering 185 shots taken during an hour session got whittled down to 13 that were different enough not to be rejected as too similar and of those, 3 were rejected anyway. I'll have to keep being the jack of all trades for now, which includes working my own business fulltime. Respect us for getting any shots at all.
Posted by Babar760 on May 17, 2011
The flaw on this post is the little amount we get for each photograph. How many .36 cent downloads do you think it will take to pay for a model ( $ 175./hr. ), stylist ( $ 125./hr. ), assistant ( $ 250./day ), lunch for 4 ( $ 40. ) and maybe traveling ( .50 cent/mile ). That comes out to $ 600. for a one hour shoot. That comes out to selling that shot 1666 times at .36 cents. Good luck with that!
Unless you've got an assembly line going or can sell your shots a few times to a ******** or Corbis for real money, this is not a good business model........Get some paid jobs, and if possible ( contract problems? ), put up the out-takes on RF stock. That model might work for a few......
Posted by Mellimage on May 17, 2011
This is a very interesting article. Once you understand and accept that you can only do so much, it is probably easier to be HAPPY with the things you DO achieve instead of being UNHAPPY with the things you DON'T achieve.
Posted by Ttbphoto on May 16, 2011
Interesting article. Thanks for your thoughts. I certainly think this is something to consider. I have also wondered before if it might be helpful to have more focus as far as subject matter. I tend to shoot all sorts of different subjects that appeal to me and I am adding new ones all the time. Where some people focus on a certain subject and mostly stick with it, so they become experts at that type of subject and get known for it. I just enjoy too many subjects to abandon any of them.
Posted by Serjedi on May 16, 2011
GREAT BLOG! THANKS
Posted by Lostarts on May 16, 2011
Interesting article. But, you also have the headache of unreliable people working with you. When you get a team of 5, then you are bound to have problems. So, some of that 'down' time will be spent on personnel issues.
Posted by Shopartgallerycom on May 16, 2011
I know only a thing: if you want exceptional results you have to put all in the game. To dedicate heart and soul.
Posted by Silent47 on May 16, 2011
If everyone was like yuri arcurs...off...It's like real life,the few leading the many:)Probably because most of us think on this like a quick way to make money.
Posted by Uptall on May 16, 2011
nice pics
Posted by smartview27 on May 16, 2011
Great blog!
Posted by Calyx22 on May 15, 2011
My thoughts on this.... I think it makes perfect sense if you are a large volume photographer. You probably make enough money to be able to hire one or more persons to help with the jobs you don't want or don't have time for. It's been written about many times, how delegation of tasks frees you to focus on what you do best so that you can be more productive. I completely agree and acknowledge the value of doing business this way. But for us small time folks, I don't produce enough volume of images for me to hire someone. So, from my position, would you say that I should spend money to make money i.e. hire help so that I in turn could produce more images and optimize my work? Or, keep slogging away until I have more success and then try this path? I'm very interested to hear your opinion. :)
Posted by Joezachs on May 15, 2011
OK .... so here I am ready to offer my services.
I am ready to do keywording for any one who is ready to do the post processing for me in exchange. Fair deal ?
Posted by Nero67 on May 15, 2011
Interesting article!!!
Posted by Groovychick69 on May 15, 2011
Great stuff!
Posted by Igordabari on May 15, 2011
I heard they were going to construct mobile phone with built-in bar (whiskey, gin) which also can be helicopter.. That's great. But as for me, I prefer to have gin, whiskey, phone, camera and helicopter separately :)

Pages:
1
 2 >
 of 2


Comments (31)

This article has been read 2503 times. 9 readers have found this article useful.
Photo credits: Arrow, Lucidwaters, Mikhail Laptev, Valeriy Lebedev.

About me


confidential info

Blogs
Archive
2011
September (1)
May (1)
February (1)
January (1)
2010
2009
2008
2007

Stock Photography that BLOGS!

Interact, make friends, share tips and techniques, have fun. Dreamstime wants your ideas and thoughts whether you are a photographer, designer or regular user. Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite images and photographers, post tutorials or simply exchange opinions with your with fellow dreamstimers.

Don't forget words and pictures go great together so make sure you choose some Dreamstime favorite pics to brighten your article. For inspiration, check out the hottest or the most useful blogs on the left.

Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite stock images and photographers

Create your blog

My favorite articles

    None

More favorite articles

Related image searches

multitasking single work team photographer

Work related stock images