Spend a few seconds to get it right in camera or spend hours fixing on a computer. Give me get it right in the camera any day. But, if you had one opportunity and didn't get that one in a million shot perfectly, well, nice to know it can be fixed, but yes, always better to work correctly with the camera.
Not sure it'll be like that,but if it was that good it'd be a shame because people would start taking even less attention to what they do in camera. Anyway it'd be an help,but it could add lots of noises and a pic will be refused for that reason too.
Not sure it'll be like that,but if it was that good it'd be a shame because people would start taking even less attention to what they do in camera. Anyway it'd be an help,but it could add lots of noises and a pic will be refused for that reason too.
I think that it will be not a magic tools to sharpen all picture but I can reduce the "unjustified none even sharpness" rejection. It is one of the tools to complete the stock photographer to deliver the picture that the market requests.
I'm sure it will do a grand job at cleaning up drunk facebook shots but doubt it would but back anywhere near enough data to be considered decent enough for stock.