Mini Review: Canon 7D for stock


posted on 11th of march, 2011
>I've owned and shot with a Canon 40D for a while now, and have been very happy with it. For my personal use it is more than adequate as well. I did feel that 10MP was starting to get dated, especially when cropped - and I figured if I was going to produce 500 photos a year in 2011 I should try to be a bit ahead of the game :) As well, I wanted a bigger viewfinder. With that in mind I upgraded to the Canon 7D.

Overall, I am quite happy with it. The jump from 10MP to 18MP is real, though it doesn't make any difference for small prints. With stock, though, things are inspected at 100% so more resolution can be important for resolving fine details, and it gives you more room to crop and still results in a 'Maximum' size file.

Here are...

[ Read more... ]
Comments (16)

Posted by Davesfreelancephotos on August 12, 2011
Hi Brad, I'm new to the Stock scene. I just read your review on the 7D. You asked if anyone else loves or hates it. I basically made the same transition as you did by going from the 40D (which I still have) to the 7 D. In between I treated myself to a 1D Mk III ...which initially I loved. I then got the 7 as a backup for the 1D....now I never use the 1D. My 7 d is now on over 300,000 shots and still working well. A great camera. I can't agree more with you on the lenses though. A lot of people think it's the camera that counts but I think you can take brilliant photo's with an old 350D if the glass infront is L or equivalent. It'll be interesting to see how long I have to wait to make my first sale.
Posted by Hunor83 on June 29, 2011
Nice shots!
Posted by Bowlingranny on June 29, 2011
I love my 7D, I also have the 5DMkII and both are great cameras, love the focus system on the 7D, my dream camera would be a 5DMKII with the same focusing system as the 7D.



Comments (16)

This article has been read 1455 times. 5 readers have found this article useful.

Is the lowest ISO the best?


posted on 16th of march, 2011
I have to admit that when it comes to ISO, I've always assumed that the base ISO was going to have the cleanest output. I had read articles on how some models of cameras were noisier at the 'in-between' ISOs (ISO 125 and 160) than the base numbers (100, 200, 400). This was true on a camera I had a while back, so I didn't really give it another thought.

I read an article in a magazine (link here) where someone took a Canon 7D with a lens cap on and compared the noise with the levels boosted up. It isn't as dramatic as the article made out, but the results surprised me a little. Turns out my 7D is just as good (or better) at ISO 160 than it is at ISO 100. That is a 2/...

[ Read more... ]
Comments (18)

Posted by Steveprorak on June 07, 2011
Nikon actually recommends that you shoot at ISO 200 on the D90 and D300s. ISO 100 is just for very bright light situations. I have never found a reason why, but I have verified that on several sites.
Posted by Sobek85 on April 15, 2011
Great article
Posted by Heathse on March 25, 2011
Thanks Brad... I've produced some lousy shots lately with ISO100 so perhaps some more experimenting is a good idea.



Comments (18)

This article has been read 1355 times. 10 readers have found this article useful.
 
About Me
(Bradcalkins)
Salmon Arm, CA
Archive
2014
January (1)
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
Blogs
    Search the blogs!
Latest articles (RSS 2.0 )
  Blast from the past
  What is a T-Stop
  Autumn and Thanksgiving is here again
  How to get ahead in stock photography
  Summer fun
  Five years, and 20,000 sales later...
  Careful with the kids!
  Stock photography heightens your senses
  Magic of Christmas
  Photokina summary

Create your own blog in seconds...
My favourite articles
None
More favorite articles

Related image searches

ISO noise digital sensor low

Sensor related stock images