posted on 3rd of march, 2011
|
|
|
|
We all are human beings. We all can be tired. We all are not able to be always right. But we all can speak to each other politely and constructively trying to explain what we think and what we want. Respecting each other. And DT, on my opinion, is very suitable place to be human beings.
Are you agree, colleagues? You aren't?! But you have to...
Lately I uploaded three images. Here they are:
All the three were rejected. Surely, I was upset. But I wrote to support. Trying to explain that reasons of rejection seemed to be wrong for me. Because (1) ... (2) ... and (3) ... Putting arguments in front of them. I finished with polite request to re-consider images. As a result, they have been moved from 'Refused files' to 'On line files'... [ Read more... ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (5)
|
 |
Posted by Uptall on March 04, 2011
|
 |
Posted by Mariaam on March 03, 2011
|
 |
I have done the same... Congratulations.
|
Comments (5) |
This article has been read 520 times. 2 readers have found this article useful.
|
|
|
posted on 4th of march, 2011
|
|
|
|
>I still do not know if it is a good idea or not, but anyway I got it a week ago and now 2 images are on-line:
How much downloaded these images will be? I have no idea... Place your bets, colleagues!!! :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (9)
|
 |
Nice idea... Good Luck
|
 |
Thanks for idea, Diane! I will think on it...
|
 |
Maybe you could put (with photoshop) your computer with that dreamstime page on one of your fantastic moon shots? ;)
|
Comments (9) |
This article has been read 606 times. 2 readers have found this article useful.
|
|
|
posted on 6th of march, 2011
|
|
|
|
It happens to me from time to time. I take shots and put images to my hard disk to process later, but then I have no time for a week or so. Or something attracts my attention and I took new shots and completely go mad on them and so, old ones stay forgotten.
And so, I decided to start March with careful inspecting my HD instead of taking new photos. And it turns out to be a good idea since I found couple of dozens photos quite suitable to be uploaded on DT. And so, I processed them and uploaded and most of them have been just approved.
I would like to say that it makes sense to inspect your HD from time to time. Some interesting photos may be kept there forgotten.
Like these ones which I re-discovered lately:
... [ Read more... ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (11)
|
 |
Good point and I have also found that as my post processing skills have improved, new packages obtained etc that pictures that may have had no potential before can now be either altered or improved to make them saleable. So it's certailny worth going back through your HD and see whats' hiding :-)
|
|
No, it is not safe and that's why I have a camera which is cheap more or less :)
|
 |
Posted by Alvera on March 09, 2011
|
Comments (11) |
This article has been read 595 times. 3 readers have found this article useful.
|
|
|
posted on 9th of march, 2011
|
|
|
|
>Noctilucent (mesospheric) clouds represent especial kind of athmospheric phenomena. In contrast to 'normal' clouds they are located in upper atmosphere (mesosphere) at altitudes about 80 kilometers, which is almost space. Noctilucent clouds can be visible in a deep twilight in the summer months at latitudes between 50° and 70° north and south. But it's extremely rare phenomenon and even at these latitudes they appear 2-3 times per summer only (in the best case). Being amateur astronomer for 35 years and ever checking sky with a great attention, I saw mesospheric clouds only several times for the whole my life.
And the most beautiful case took place at midnight between June 18 and 19, 2010. I noticed clouds at 11 p.m. out of my window. It was just fantastic show! Very tender silver-like net (that'... [ Read more... ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (10)
|
|
It happens sometimes. But extremely rarely. Even being at 56 I see it not each year... In 2010 they appeared only twice in Moscow.
|
|
Posted by Alvera on March 10, 2011
|
 |
Posted by Py2000 on March 10, 2011
|
Comments (10) |
This article has been read 1018 times. 5 readers have found this article useful.
|
|
|
posted on 11th of march, 2011
|
|
|
|
>I always dremt to take photograpy of a firework. And finally I managed to do this. Unfortunately, fireworks are very short events and it is not possible to change spot adjusting for the best view. One does not know EXACTLY where it will happen. Noway to set composition before it starts...
For my first firework session on March 6th 2011 (it was dedicated to the beginning of orthodoxal Lent) I choosen the spot at the Red Square in Moscow with Saint Basil's Cathedral that served as an excellent foreground.
My idea was to use exposure time which would be long enough to catch essential part of firework splashes. I wanted to catch not a short moment but development of splashes.
Here are settings: (1) tripod, (2) ISO100 (to supress noise), (3) t=2sec, (4) f/7.1. I had to choose the last parameter... [ Read more... ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (19)
|
|
Thanks, Valentina!
|
 |
Posted by Effavale on September 10, 2012
Good luck!
|
|
Buona fortuna a te Francesco!
|
Comments (19) |
This article has been read 968 times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
About Me
| Search the blogs! |
 |
|
|
|
|
