In an article that (may) receives applause from traditionalists, Chris Ferrone describes
an obvious case of sensitive usage associated with Model Release issues (or better said total absence of).
Next time you get a refusal based on a legal issue (potential trademark infringement or something that seems nonsense about your MR) think about this case:
Virgin Mobile using photo without a model release
Is it the site's fault, the CC license's or the designer's fault?