nature photos


posted on 19th of may, 2008

Do you think that getting photos from natural environments of wildlife have more value then if the photo is shot in zoos or parks? almost all of my images are done in natural settings, it is more time consuming but I feel that the image is much more real what do you think?

Comments (4)

Posted by Bigpressphoto on June 27, 2008
I agree the natural shots are more powerful ,especially leopard and owls you have great shots. Donna
Posted by Photomyeye on May 26, 2008
tha is 4 sure
Posted by Flatscreen on May 19, 2008
I think it is more exciting to shoot in the wilderness. Of course it is not even easier to take good pictures in the zoo, because of fences or walls etc. But you can imagine, that if you have ever been in the wild - that feeling is incomparable!
Posted by Ellenboughn on May 19, 2008
If the quality of the images are equal, the images shot in the wild are much more desirable.



This article has been read 1390 times.
Photo credits: Photomyeye.

About me

Thank you for your interest in my photos. I would be grateful if the buyers of my photographs let me know how and where my work is used.


confidential info

Blogs Exclusive user
Archive
2008
August (1)
June (1)
May (1)

Stock Photography that BLOGS!

Interact, make friends, share tips and techniques, have fun. Dreamstime wants your ideas and thoughts whether you are a photographer, designer or regular user. Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite images and photographers, post tutorials or simply exchange opinions with your with fellow dreamstimers.

Don't forget words and pictures go great together so make sure you choose some Dreamstime favorite pics to brighten your article. For inspiration, check out the hottest or the most useful blogs on the left.

Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite stock images and photographers

Create your blog

My favorite articles

    None

More favorite articles

Related image searches

animals nature habitat zoos