A while ago I asked advise on this board from people using various fish-eye lenses, which of them was better, becuase I planned to buy a suspiciously cheap one from ebay. Here is the discussion .
Now I can say that I made an experiment: my cheap (about 30$ including delivery) Bower fish-eye macro arrived and I even made few shots with it. Here is my impression.
This "lense" resembles a big fillter consisting of several parts and is to be used on top of a normal lense. I use it with Canon 400D camera and Tamron 18-200mm (it's already a bit extreme, but works fine on travel and studio). The fish-eye's thread size is 58mm and to fix it with Tamron's 62mm thread I use an extension ring (7$ more). Altogether the construction can be autofocused, which is interesting. Because when I tried to use this fish-eye (with another extension ring) on my Canon5DMarkii and (don't laught, please) Canon L 50mm1,2 lense, it couldn't focus at all, even manually.
The minuses of using this cheap fish-eye compare to decent and more expensive real ones are the following:
- the image becomes small, because it crops a piece out of a crop. - the quality of image made with a decent lense is, of course, higher in general. But I discovered pluses, too.
- on some angles my cheap fish-eye makes a funny natural blur effect, at the same time a part of an image still remains sharp. At this case the image is quite large (all croped matrix is used) and almost doesn't requre post-processing.
- without much risk it gives the possibility to try fish-eye effect before making desision if you really want to spend money on an expensive new lense or you don't use it too often.
So, my opinion - it's not bad to have such a toy. Variety inspires.
Here is how the lense looks and how it shoots :) Some of it's images are already approved on DT. Next time I'll try to do more :)
I had a similar dilema short time ago (buy fish-eye lens or convertor) and decided finally to buy convertor fof my 72mm diameter objective. Its Vitacon Digital wide converter/macro 0,5 and I think that as aditional solution works just fine.. only depends on base objective, characteristics stay the same.
This article has been read 1441 times. 1 readers have found this article useful. Photo credits: Julia161.
Interact, make friends, share tips and techniques, have fun. Dreamstime wants your ideas and thoughts whether you are a photographer, designer or regular user. Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite images and photographers, post tutorials or simply exchange opinions with your with fellow dreamstimers.
Don't forget words and pictures go great together so make sure you choose some Dreamstime favorite pics to brighten your article. For inspiration, check out the hottest or the most useful blogs on the left.
Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite stock images and photographers