A while ago I asked advise on this board from people using various fish-eye lenses, which of them was better, becuase I planned to buy a suspiciously cheap one from ebay. Here is the discussion .
Now I can say that I made an experiment: my cheap (about 30$ including delivery) Bower fish-eye macro arrived and I even made few shots with it. Here is my impression.
This "lense" resembles a big fillter consisting of several parts and is to be used on top of a normal lense. I use it with Canon 400D camera and Tamron 18-200mm (it's already a bit extreme, but works fine on travel and studio). The fish-eye's thread size is 58mm and to fix it with Tamron's 62mm thread I use an extension ring (7$ more). Altogether...
I had a similar dilema short time ago (buy fish-eye lens or convertor) and decided finally to buy convertor fof my 72mm diameter objective. Its Vitacon Digital wide converter/macro 0,5 and I think that as aditional solution works just fine.. only depends on base objective, characteristics stay the same.
This article has been read 1405 times. 1 readers have found this article useful.
Interact, make friends, share tips and techniques, have fun. Dreamstime wants your ideas and thoughts whether you are a photographer, designer or regular user. Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite images and photographers, post tutorials or simply exchange opinions with your with fellow dreamstimers.
Don't forget words and pictures go great together so make sure you choose some Dreamstime favorite pics to brighten your article. For inspiration, check out the hottest or the most useful blogs on the left.
Create a blog to tell your story, promote favorite stock images and photographers